TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT – casual – ss.394, 400, 604 Fair Work Act 2009 – appeal – Full Bench – at first instance Commission found applicant was unfairly dismissed and ordered his reinstatement on a permanent part-time basis – appellant argued Commission had not considered the meaning of casual employee under the Social, Community, Home Care and Disability Services Industry Award 2010 as one employed and paid as such – Full Bench found the decision of the Commission was in error because it made an incorrect finding of fact on the employment status of the employee – Commission had denied parties procedural fairness – Full Bench held the employee was engaged as a casual employee and was not a full-time or part-time employee – appeal allowed – unfair dismissal application remitted for hearing and determination. Appeal by Nardy House against decision of Riordan C of 6 January 2016 [[2016] FWC 73] Re: Perry
