NEWS-HR

Lutheran Church of Australia Queensland District is defending a s.394 (Application for unfair dismissal remedy) before Commissioner Hunt in Hearing Room 4 in Brisbane (Bos).

Amana Living Incorporated has a (s.372 – Application to deal with other contravention disputes) matter before Deputy President Beaumont in Conference Room 12.33 & Breakout Room in Perth (Pattullil Abraham).

Mater Health Services (Mater Misericordiae Health Services Brisbane Limited) has been served with a (s.739 – Application to deal with a dispute) by a staffer (Cook).

Health Services Union and Able Australia Services have a s.739 (Application to deal with a dispute) before Deputy President Hamilton in Court 3 & Conference Room B – level 6 in Melbourne today.

Health Services Union – Victoria No.1 Branch has a (s.394 – Application for unfair dismissal remedy) with which it must deal (Sanli).

JM Golden Care Pty Ltd has a brace of (s.739 – Application to deal with a dispute) to defend before Commissioner Bissett in Court 5 & Conference Room D – level 6 in Melbourne (Anderson/Wardill).

TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT – misconduct – ss.394, 400, 604 Fair Work Act 2009 – permission to appeal – Full Bench – appellant employer sought permission to appeal decision granting unfair dismissal remedy for respondent employee – employee granted compensation in lieu of reinstatement at first instance – employer contended evidence at first instance too fragile to support findings made at first instance – no probative evidence to support finding at first instance that witnesses colluded together to make complaint against employee consistent – contended permission to appeal would be in public interest because issues in appeal concerned significant and fundamental appellable error – Full Bench found contents on emails containing complaints not so strikingly similar as to support inference much less conclusion of collusion in their preparation – findings of collusion in context in which findings were made amounted to findings of serious inappropriate conduct in the workplace – such serious findings must have probative evidentiary foundation – Full Bench found it arguable that evidence relied upon by Commission could not properly support serious findings that he made – found collusion findings appeared to be inextricably linked to motives attributed to each of the witnesses to injure employee’s employment with employer so as to raise arguable case of appellable error as to credibility findings made by Commission – Full Bench satisfied arguable case of appellable error in nature [House v The King] – permission to appeal granted – substantive appeal to be heard. Appeal by Thompson Healthcare P/L against decision and order of Sams DP of 28 July 2017 [[2017] FWC 3505] Re: Adamopoulos

TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT – misconduct – s.394 Fair Work Act 2009 – application for unfair dismissal remedy – applicant alleged termination of employment was unfair – commenced employment with respondent August 2014 until dismissal 31 March 2017 – respondent alleged applicant failed to follow lawful instruction by not completing audit for Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet and taking unauthorised leave on multiple occasions – applicant accepted she failed to follow lawful instruction and took unauthorised leave – applicant provided with written warning on 21 March 2017 and termination of employment letter on 21 March 2017 – applicant alleged employment terminated after emailing fraud concerns to respondent on 29 March 2017 – Commission accepted the dismissal was procedurally flawed however was not sufficient to find in favour of applicant – satisfied respondent had valid reason for termination – dismissal not harsh, unjust or unreasonable – application dismissed. Douglas v Bynoe Community Advancement Cooperative Society Ltd