NEWS-HR

A s.437 (Application for a protected action ballot order) from the Health Services Union – New South Wales branch involving Calvary Health Care ACT Ltd T/A Calvary Public Hospital Bruce; ACT Health has been issued by Fair Work Commissioner Johns in Melbourne on 18 May 2018.

Estia Investments Pty Ltd is having a hell of a time shaking a s.394 (Application for unfair dismissal remedy) in front of Fair Work Commissioner Platt in Conference Room 6a – Level 6 in Adelaide (Walker).

The Health Services Union and Harbison Memorial Retirement Village have a s.739 (Application to deal with a dispute) live before Fair Work Commissioner Riordan in his Sydney chambers for adjudication at 9am.

A s.394 (Unfair dismissal) claim by Tawanda Gadzikwa against the Australian Government Department of Human Services T/A Department of Human Services has been rejected by Fair Work Deputy President Clancy in Melbourne on 17 May 2018.

Anglicare North Queensland Limited is to defend a s.394 (Application for unfair dismissal remedy) in front of Fair Work Commissioner Spencer in his Brisbane chambers (McEwan).

A s.365 (General Protections) application by Manoj Handique to be allowed more time in which to pursue Mission Australia Housing for unfair dismissal has been refused by Fair Work Commissioner Platt in Adelaide on 18 May 2018.

Australian Pharmaceutical Industries Limited will defend a s.394 (Application for unfair dismissal remedy) before Fair Work Senior Deputy President Hamberger in Hearing Room 14-1 – Level 14 in Sydney (Yazgan).

A s.394 (Application for unfair dismissal remedy) by Nadia Cammarere against Aboriginal Elders and Community Care Services T/A Aboriginal Community Services has been denied by Fair Work Commissioner Hampton in Sydney on 16 May 2018. The case summary covers the Application for relief from unfair dismissal – whether protected from unfair dismissal – minimum employment period – dispute about correct commencement date – whether periods of unpaid leave to be excluded for the purposes of continuous service – whether discretion exists to take account of the fairness of the circumstances – minimum employment period not met – no jurisdiction – application dismissed.