NEWS-HR

A s.318 (Application for an order relating to instruments covering new employer and transferring employees) and a s.319 (Application for an order relating to instruments covering new employer and non-transferring employees) lodged by Karingal St Laurence Limited T/A genU have been ratified by Fair Work Deputy President Masson sitting in Melbourne, on 31 May 2019.

A s.604—Appeal of decision by Inna Grabovsky citing the United Protestant Association NSW Ltd T/A UPA was heard by Deputy President Gostencnik, Deputy President Colman, and Deputy President Saunders, in Melbourne, on 27 May 2019. The application has been rejected. “In our decision published on 26 March 2019 1 (Decision) we refused Mrs Inna Grabovksy’s application for permission to appeal against a decision of Commissioner Johns dismissing an application made by her under s.739 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act). On 15 April 2019 Mr Igor Grabovsky filed an application by Mrs Grabovksy under s.602 of the Act seeking that we correct various purported ‘obvious errors, defects or irregularities’ in our Decision. We gave United Protestant Association NSW Ltd an opportunity to express its view on the application if it wished to do so. It did not respond. In a document of 71 pages in length, Mr Grabovsky sets out the purported errors that he says should be corrected, the effect of which would result in the removal of 12 of the 30 paragraphs of the Decision. As should be clear from the terms of s.602 and as the Explanatory Memorandum to the Fair Work Bill 2008 makes clear, s.602 is intended to be a statutory analogue for the ‘slip rule’ used by superior courts to correct certain errors in orders. 2 We do not consider the Decision to be affected by any obvious errors, defects or irregularities amenable to correction under s.602 of the Act. The application is therefore dismissed. If Mrs Grabovksy is aggrieved by the Decision or by this decision she may seek judicial review in the Federal Court of Australia. We do not propose to engage further with Mrs Grabovsky or Mr Grabovksy about either decision.”

Queensland Indigenous Family Violence Legal Services (QIFVLS) Aboriginal Corporation (“QIFVLS”) will debate a s.394 (Application for unfair dismissal remedy) before Fair Work Commissioner Spencer in Chambers in Brisbane (Freeman).

Safe Places Community Services Limited has a s.739 (Application to deal with a dispute) to argue in front of Fair Work Commissioner Booth in Chambers in Brisbane (Watson).

The Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical, and Services Union and Latrobe Community Health Service Limited have a s.739 (Application to deal with a dispute) to debate before Fair Work Commissioner Harper-Greenwell in Court 5 – Level 6 and Conference Room D – Level 6 in Melbourne.

A section 394 (Application for unfair dismissal remedy) by Richard Peel naming the Ceduna Aboriginal Corporation has been rejected by Fair Work Deputy President Anderson in Adelaide on 3 June 2019. The adjudication read (in part) “Having regard to the circumstances of this matter, I am satisfied that as the application was not accompanied by the fee prescribed by the FW Act, the application was not made in accordance with the FW Act. As such, the application is dismissed pursuant to section 587(1)(a) of the FW Act. An order to this effect will be issued.”

Compass Group Australia has a s.394 (Application for unfair dismissal remedy) which it will answer before Fair Work Deputy President Clancy in Chambers in Brisbane (Finn).

Seventh Day Adventist Church Aged Care – Retirement Plus will front a s.394 (Application for unfair dismissal remedy) before Fair Work Deputy President Asbury in Chambers in Brisbane (Cook).