NEWS-HR

Western Victoria Primary Health Care Network & Fuse Advisory have a s.739 (Application to deal with a dispute) on foot before Commissioner Yilmaz in Court 10 (Primary Court Room) & Court 9 (Conference Room) – Level 5 in Melbourne (Axtens/Urquhart).

Civic Disability Services Ltd has a s.739 (Application to deal with a dispute) with which it must deal before Fair Work Commissioner Johns in Chambers in Melbourne (Shuttleworth).

A s.185 (Enteprise agreement) application from East Sydney Day Hospital Pty Ltd T/A East Sydney Private Hospital for the East Sydney Private Hospital Nurses’ NSWNMA/ANMF NSW Branch Enterprise Agreement 2018-2020 has been ratified by Fair Work Commissioner Harper-Greenwell, in Melbourne, on 13 June 2019.

Tessa Residential Pty Ltd has received notice of a s.394 (Application for unfair dismissal remedy) application listed for hearing before Fair Work Commissioner Simpson in Chambers in Brisbane (Martin).

Wilson Medic One has been served with a s.739 (Application to deal with a dispute) breach notice. Fair Work Commissioner Harper-Greenwell in Court 12 – Level 5 and Conference Room A – Level 5 in Melbourne will test the United Voice claim.

A s.185 (Enterprise agreement) application by The Trustee for ePharmacy Unit Trust T/A ePharmacy Group Pty Ltd for its ePharmacy Preston Enterprise Agreement 2019 has been ratified by Fair Work Deputy President Masson, in Melbourne, on 15 May 2019.

A section 185 (Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement) by St John Ambulance Australia SA Inc T/A St John Ambulance Australia SA Inc for its St John Ambulance Victoria SA Inc. Employees Enterprise Agreement 2018 (Social, community, home care and disability services) has been stamped by Fair Work Deputy President Anderson, in Adelaide, on 17 May 2019.

A s.394 (Unfair dismissal) application by Melissa Tuchin against Ekera Dental Pty Ltd has been rejected by Fair Work Deputy President Clancy, in Melbourne, on 22 May 2019. He took the view she had abandoned the claim. “The power to dismiss an application if the non-compliance was unreasonable is discretionary. Other than initially filing her application and attending the conciliation, Ms Tuchin has failed to actively prosecute her case and has provided no explanation to the Commission for either her continued failure to comply with the directions or her failure to attend the non-compliance hearing on 10 May 2019. This is despite acknowledging in the call to the Commission on 16 May 2019 that she had received an email directing her to file material by 17 May 2019. In these circumstances, I am persuaded that I should exercise my discretion under s.399A and dismiss Ms Tuchin’s application. This ends her unfair dismissal application.”